Peer Reviewed Journal Research Article on How Values Differ Across Age and Culture

• Journal Listing
• Front end Psychol
• PMC5366355

Forepart Psychol. 2017; viii: 457.

When Age and Civilisation Collaborate in an Like shooting fish in a barrel and Yet Cognitively Demanding Task: Older Adults, But Not Younger Adults, Showed the Expected Cultural Differences

Jinkyung Na

¹Department of Psychology Sogang University, Seoul, South Korea

Chih-Mao Huang

ⁱⁱDepartment of Biological Scientific discipline and Technology National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan

Denise C. Park

ⁱⁱⁱCentre for Vital Longevity, Academy of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA

Received 2016 Dec 12; Accepted 2017 Mar 13.

Abstruse

The interaction between historic period and culture can have diverse implications for knowledge as age represents the effect of biological processes whereas culture represents the effect of sustaining experiences. Nevertheless, their interaction has rarely been examined. Thus, based on the fact that Asians are more than intuitive in reasoning than Americans, we examined how this cultural divergence might interact with historic period. Immature and erstwhile participants from the US and Singapore performed a categorization task (living vs. non-living). To measure their reliance on intuition, we manipulated the typicality of targets (animate vs. inanimate). Nosotros showed that (1) RTs for inanimate organisms were slower than RTs for animate organisms (atypicality toll), (two) the cost was particularly big for older adults and (3) an age × civilisation interaction was observed such that cultural differences in the toll (Singaporeans > Americans) was found just among older participants. Farther, we demonstrated that the age upshot was associated with cognitive function and the culture event among older adults was associated with cultural values. Finally, a moderated mediation analysis suggests that cognitive function and cultural values interact with each other in society to jointly influence one'south cognition.

Keywords: aged, culture, cerebral manner, categorization, cultural differences

When Age and Civilization Collaborate in Cognition: A Example of Categorization

As early equally James (1890/1950), psychologists have investigated individual variations in knowledge. 2 important sources of differences in cognition are historic period and civilization, each of which has been closely investigated. With increased historic period, adults show decreased performance in many cognitive domains, including processing speed, working memory, long-term memory, and reasoning; although measures of full general knowledge are shown to exist age-invariant (Park et al., 1996; Park and Gutchess, 2002). With respect to civilisation, a large number of studies have also demonstrated considerable cross-cultural differences in cognition (Nisbett et al., 2001). Westerners (e.g., Due north Americans and Western Europeans) tend to exist analytic in their reasoning – focusing on a salient object, separating it from the context, and basing their reasoning on logical rules, whereas East Asians (e.g., Koreans, Japanese, and Chinese) tend to be holistic – broadly attention to the entire context and basing their reasoning on experiential knowledge (eastward.g., intuition). Although aging and cultural influences on cognition have both been well-documented, at that place has been surprisingly niggling investigation of their interactions (come across Park and Gutchess, 2002 or Chua et al., 2006 for notable exceptions). Therefore, the present inquiry attempted to examine how historic period and culture combine to jointly influence our cognition.

Age, Culture, and Cognition

Then how might age and civilisation come up together to determine 1's cognition? Park et al. (1999) suggest that in cases where historic period and civilization interact, the form of the interaction volition depend on the nature of a job. Starting time, if performance on a culturally sensitive task relies primarily on cultural knowledge (as opposed to cerebral resource), cultural effects on cognition may exist well-maintained through late adulthood, since acquired noesis (e.g., vocabulary) is less probable to show typical historic period-related declines (Park et al., 1996). Consistent with this notion, contempo inquiry has institute that both younger and onetime participants in Japan and the United states showed comparably sized cultural differences on cognitive tasks which are sensitive to cultural experiences but not necessarily demanding of cognitive resources (Kitayama et al., 2013, unpublished). For example, they examined participants' preferences for analytic vs. holistic reasoning (e.g., taxonomic vs. thematic categorization). That is, the tasks used in their enquiry measured cognitive styles (i.eastward., preferences shaped by cultural cognition) rather than cognitive abilities and, in these tasks, comparable cultural differences were maintained across the lifespan. Notably, they found that ane's responses in these tasks were not associated with bones cognitive functions such every bit processing speed. In this sense, these tasks can exist said to exist relatively insensitive to cerebral resources.

However, Park et al. (1999) besides propose that the interaction between age and civilisation may take a dissimilar form. Specifically, they predicted that cultural differences would exist minimized with age due to the strong and universal effects of age-related turn down on the job ("biological leveling"), if a job where cultural differences are observed in young is enervating of cerebral resources such as working retention and processing speed. In line with this suggestion, Hedden et al. (2002) examined both speed and working retention and reported the evidence of biological leveling –that is, culture effects decreased with age. More specifically, Chinese young adults outperformed American young adults in numerically based tasks, namely the digit comparison as a processing speed task and the digit span as a working memory task. The differences were due to the fact that Chinese syllables for numbers impose a lower processing load than American syllables for numbers (Cheung and Kemper, 1993). More than chiefly, however, these cultural differences were not observed between Chinese and American older adults (over 60).

It is noteworthy that the nature of a given job is largely determined by the way it is prepare. For example, an attribution task can be made up mainly as a cerebral style measure (i.e., low sensitivity to cognitive resources) by investigating one's relative preference between dispositional and situational explanations without any clear indication that i is more accurate than the other. Or alternatively, an attribution chore can be presented in a resource-dependent manner (i.e., high sensitivity to cognitive resources) by measuring one's ability to overcome cultural bias toward dispositional or situational explanations when one is clearly more accurate than the other. In other words, cultural differences in attribution typically found among immature adults may or may non exist observed among older adults depending on how a given attribution task is ready.

To sum up, previous literature has identified two different forms of the age × culture interaction: (one) no interaction with historic period (i.e., cultural differences in cognition are held across the lifespan) occurs when the focus is on cognitive styles (e.g., Kitayama et al., 2012, unpublished) and (2) a convergent pattern (i.e., cultural differences in cognition subtract as a function of age) occurs when a given job is sensitive to cognitive resource and age-related declines dilute cultural differences among older adults (e.g., Hedden et al., 2002). Building on the literature, nosotros propose that the interaction between age and culture may have withal some other class. Specifically, we predicted that cultural differences in noesis could diverge with crumbling (i.e., cultural differences in noesis could be larger among older adults than amongst younger adults). Nosotros further argue that this type of interaction betwixt historic period and culture should occur when a culturally sensitive chore makes relatively depression demands on cognition. In this case, immature adults from the two cultures might have sufficient cognitive resources to overcome biases that their cultural mode of reasoning may produce, but older adults would not, resulting in the interaction.

For instance, if East Asian/holistic reasoning leads to better performance in a given chore than American/analytic reasoning, American participants may face cultural disadvantages in performing the task. However, if the chore is easy, young Americans would be able to overcome any cultural disadvantage that the task may impose, since they take sufficient resource to mitigate such disadvantage. In that instance, cultural differences between immature Americans and East Asians would exist modest at best. In contrast, however, older Americans may not be able to overcome cultural disadvantages due to the decline in cerebral resources, which would lead to greater cultural differences between older Americans and East Asians. Note that cultural psychologists have thus far been more interested in cerebral style than cerebral performance and hence, in most tasks they have designed, cognitive load or task difficulty is not directly relevant to the magnitude of cultural differences. Following this logic, the present research investigated whether the predicted pattern of the age × culture interaction (i.eastward., divergence with aging between cultures) would occur when a given task is sensitive to both cultural experiences/cognitive style and cerebral resources/cognitive performance but at the aforementioned time, when the cognitive load for the job is depression for younger adults.

2 separate lines of inquiry provide initial support for this predicted form of the age × civilization interaction. The first line of piece of work that is relevant to the nowadays assay comes from a literature of cultural differences in the correspondence bias (i.eastward., biased toward dispositional attribution in social perception). This literature examines the moderation consequence of cognitive load on the magnitude of cultural differences. For example, the correspondence bias was much more pronounced amidst Westerners than East Asians (Choi et al., 1999) and moreover, Knowles et al. (2001) found that such cultural differences in correspondence bias was magnified by cognitive load since it is cognitively demanding for Americans to accept into business relationship situational constraints. Similarly, old Americans showed the largest correspondence bias (Blanchard-Fields et al., 2007). These finding clearly demonstrates that cognitive load interacts with cultural style of reasoning and that historic period-related declines tin can be a critical factor in cultural differences in noesis. Secondly, another relevant line of findings was reported in the literature on cognitive aging (Gutchess et al., 2006; Yang et al., 2013). For example, Gutchess et al. (2006) showed that East Asians organized knowledge based on taxonomic categories less than did Americans and farther, this trend was specially evident among older East Asians presumably because of age-related declines in cognitive resources. Their findings are highly consequent with ours. Building on their findings, the present work directly measured cognitive office and investigated whether cognitive function would interact with culture in a way that we predicted.

Present Inquiry

In order to investigate the hypothesized form of the age × culture interaction, we studied the typicality upshot in category judgments – a reasoning task which shows robust cultural differences and also relies on cognitive resource. The typicality consequence occurs when people projection unknown features from a superordinate category (e.g., bird) to subordinate categories (e.g., hawkeye or penguin) more easily for typical members equally opposed to atypical members (Sloman, 1993). For example, given that all birds have ulnar arteries, people thought information technology was more likely that all eagles have ulnar arteries than that all penguins have ulnar arteries because an eagle is more typical than a penguin as a member of the bird category. Importantly, the typicality effect is shown to be sensitive to cultural influences (Norenzayan et al., 2002). They found that Due east Asian culture promotes intuitive reasoning and consequently, E Asians are more than susceptible to the typicality consequence than Americans. The effect tin be too resource-sensitive, every bit one is required to inhibit an intuitive judgment (based on typicality) and apply logical rules. Hence, we hypothesized that older adults might be more disrupted by the typicality effect than younger adults, since older adults have difficulties in inhibition across various domains (Hasher and Zacks, 1988; Spieler et al., 1996). Taken together, the typicality issue can be sensitive to both aging and cultural influences and provides a rare opportunity to examination the age × culture interaction. Therefore, in the present work, we recruited both young and former participants in the U.s.a. and Singapore and had them brand category judgments (i.east., whether a target belongs to the category of living organisms) for either typical targets (living and animate) or singular targets (living and yet inanimate). Moreover, it is important to note that this type of category judgments is a uncomplicated semantic judgment and its cerebral loads are probable to be low for younger adults. Thus, we expected that both age-related cognitive decline and cultural modes of reasoning might reveal the predicted pattern of the age × culture interaction.

In addition, nosotros expected that cultural difference in category judgment would be closely linked to cultural values, since we reasoned that those who endorsed Due east Asian cultural values would too prove Eastward Asian reasoning (i.eastward., existence intuitive). Furthermore, nosotros predicted that the association betwixt cultural values and reasoning would be moderated past cognitive function. That is, a person who highly endorses values in E Asian culture would be more than likely to adopt intuitive reasoning and thus, to be particularly vulnerable for the typicality effect. Notwithstanding, such links between cultural values and reasoning would be attenuated if he or she had enough cognitive resources to overcome the bias resulting from the intuitive reasoning. In order to exam this moderated arbitration model, we also measured participants' cognitive function and value endorsement.

In sum, the nowadays research investigated the interaction betwixt crumbling and civilisation in the domain of categorization. Given that crumbling and civilisation are, respectively, neurobiological and experiential processes, the present investigation could demonstrate the dynamic interplay between neurobiological decline (aging) and experiential factors (culture).

Materials and Methods

Participants

One hundred and five Americans (Usa) and 98 Chinese Singaporeans (SG) participated in the written report. Younger US (Due north = 51) and SG (Northward = 49) participants were college students. Older participants in both cultures (U.s.a.: N = 54 and SG: N = 49) were recruited via community organizations and advertisements. All participants were screened for psychological and physical health. Specifically, volunteers were excluded if there was (ane) evidence of psychiatric illness within the by two years, including substance abuse, (2) a history of recreational drug apply in the previous 6 months, (3) less than 10 years of educational activity, (4) less than 20/30 vision after correction, and (five) a history of CNS affliction or brain injury. Too, those who scored lower than 26 on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE; Folstein et al., 1975) were excluded. Therefore, it can be said that our participants were physically and psychologically healthy.

Procedures

Category Judgment

Participants were presented with 64 English-word stimuli ¹ and instructed to indicate whether or non each stimulus was a living organism by pressing a designated fundamental. Each give-and-take was displayed for 3 s followed by a 500 ms fixation. Half of words were non-living objects, whereas the others were living objects. Among the 32 living objects, six atypical targets were embedded and these items were the focus of the nowadays study (see the Appendix for details). The items were atypical in that they were living but inanimate organisms (e.g., seaweed) and were assorted with typical items that were living and animate (due east.g., bear). Given that East Asians are culturally encouraged to exist intuitive, we reasoned that the singular trials would pose a bigger trouble for Singaporeans than to Americans. Nevertheless, immature Singaporeans would be able to successfully address such cultural disadvantage since the job would be fairly easy for them and thus, they would have enough cognitive resources to overcome it. Therefore, we predicted the age × culture interaction such that cultural differences would be minimal among young participants merely axiomatic among older participants. To ensure that cognitive loads for the task were low, we did not include any ambiguous items.

Cognitive Function

In social club to characterize historic period and cultural differences in cognitive office, nosotros included two processing-speed tasks (i.due east., Blueprint and Dot Matching tasks), a reasoning task (the Cattell Culture-Off-white chore; Cattell, 1949), and 2 retention tasks (i.e., Spatial Span and Give-and-take) (see Chee et al., 2010 for details). To create a summary alphabetize for cognitive role, nosotros ran a principle component analysis (PCA) on the measures of speed, working memory, and reasoning that comprised the cognitive battery. The PCA yielded two components. Since the first component accounted for 53% of variances and all the measures were well-loaded on information technology (0.63 < all loadings < 0.80), the gene scores of the first component was used as a proxy for cognitive ability (note that the second component deemed for only 15% of the variance).

Cultural Values

To narrate cultural differences in values, we administered the Schwartz Value Survey (SVS; Schwartz, 1992). Since we reasoned that those who endorsed East Asian cultural values would also show East Asian reasoning (i.e., being intuitive), we focused on one higher-order value type that we believe to exist highly endorsed in East asia, namely conservation (a set up of values justifying the belief that people are truly embedded in their groups; Schwartz, 1999). Consistent with this reasoning, previous written report showed that conservation was more endorsed by East Asian cultures such equally Prc and Korea than past English-speaking cultures such as American and Canada (Schwartz, 1999). Conservation consists of three value types, Tradition, Conformity, and Security (Schwartz, 1994). In the SVS, there are 14 items measuring these 3 value types, Tradition (5 item such as Apprehensive and Moderate), Conformity (four items such equally Honoring Parents and Elders and Obedient), and Security (v items such every bit Social Lodge and Sense of Belonging). Participants reported personal importance of each detail on a 9-indicate calibration (-one: Opposite of what I value to seven: Extremely Important). In our information, the reliability of conservation was adequate in both cultures (US: α = 0.81 and SG:α = 0.86). Thus, the index of conservation was created past averaging them.

Results

Sample Characteristics

Demographic Information

Demographic variables such as age and gender did not vary significantly across 2 cultures except for education years. A two (Historic period: Young vs. Quondam) × ii (Culture: SG vs. US) ANOVA on education years revealed a chief issue of culture (United states > SG), F(1,199) = 21.ten, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.ten. Moreover, this culture consequence was qualified by a significant Age × Culture interaction, F(1,199) = 16.55, p < 0.001, η p two = 0.08, such that former Americans (M = 15.46) were more educated than erstwhile Singaporeans (M = 12.74), t(101) = five.26, p < 0.001, d = 1.05, while there was no departure between young Americans (M = xiv.52) and young Singaporeans (14.33). Also, the main consequence of age was non significant. Taken together, participants from each civilization were comparable in terms of demographic variables except that older American participants were better educated than sometime Singaporean participants (encounter Table ​ ane for detailed information). The difference in education years may exist critical because education could influence their performance in the category judgment task and thus, education years were included in the main analyses (reported beneath) as a covariate. This outcome is farther addressed in the discussion section.

Table 1

Demographic information.

	Us		Singapore
	Young (51)	Old (54)	Young (49)	Onetime (49)
Gender	Grand: 26 F: 25	M: 25 F: 29	Yard: 25 F: 24	M:24 F: 25
Mean age	22.03	66.61	24.22	65.96
Age range	20–29	61–78	20–thirty	61–76
MMSE	29.08 (1.01)	28.28 (1.18)	29.38 (0.92)	28.thirty (1.xvi)
Didactics years	14.52 (one.83)	xv.46 (2.58)	fourteen.33 (one.52)	12.74 (2.66)

Cognitive Function

A ii (age) × 2 (civilisation) ANCOVA on the index with education years as a covariate revealed that showtime, there was no cultural deviation in cerebral function, F < 1; 2nd, older participants scored lower than younger participants, F(1,198) = 303.64, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.61 and finally, the age consequence was not qualified by culture, F < i, Usa: Ms = 0.79 (Young) vs. -0.68 (Old), t(103) = 11.97, p < 0.001, d = 2.36, and SG: Ms = 0.80 (Young) vs. -0.82 (Old), t(96) = 12.84, p < 0.001, d = ii.62. In other words, in terms of cognitive function, there was no cultural divergence and historic period-related cognitive declines were comparable across two cultural groups. Also, note that educations years did not accept significant touch on on cognitive function, F(1,198) = 1.09, p = 0.299, η p two = 0.005.

Cultural Values

A two (age) × ii (culture) ACNOVA on the alphabetize of conservation with education years as a covariate found a main event of age (Old > Young), F(1,198) = 59.84, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.23, and a main effect of culture, F(ane, 198) = 62.53, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.24. Also, the interaction between age and culture was non significant, F < 1. Thus, confirming our prediction, Singaporean were higher on conservation than Americans both for younger participants: SG = 19.48 vs. Us = 15.54, t(98) = 6.00, p < 0.001, d = one.21 and for older participants: SG = 23.33 vs. US = 19.17, t(101) = five.96, p < 0.001, d = ane.19. We also annotation that cultural values did not significantly vary as a function of instruction years, F < 1.

Category Judgment

Accuracy

As the first step ^two in the assay of the category judgment data, nosotros conducted a 2 (Historic period: Young vs. Old) × ii (Culture: SG vs. US) × ii (Type: Breathing vs. Inanimate) mixed ANCOVA on the overall accuracy with type equally a within-field of study gene and instruction years as a covariate. The ANCOVA did not observe any significant result. That is, the overall accuracy did non vary as a part of trial type, age and civilization. Rather, there was a loftier rate of accurateness, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 among the 4 groups. In other words, a ceiling effect was observed, which confirms our expectation that the category judgment task would be easy enough for all the participants. More importantly, this outcome allowed us to test our disquisitional prediction, whether cultural differences would be pregnant for older adults notwithstanding negligible for younger participants when a given task is easy.

Reaction Time

We predicted that Singaporeans would prove larger typicality effects (slower RT for inanimate than for animate organisms) than Americans and yet, these cultural differences would exist less (or not) evident for younger participant than for older participants. In lodge to exam the prediction, we conducted a 2 (Historic period: Immature vs. Old) × 2 (Culture: SG vs. U.s.a.) × two (Blazon: Animate vs. Inanimate) mixed ANCOVA on the reaction times (RTs) information with type equally a within-bailiwick cistron and education years as a covariate. The critical exam of our prediction is whether the 3-way interaction would turn out to exist significant in this mixed ANCOVA. Confirming our prediction, the results showed the significant iii-way interaction, F(1,198) = 4.93, p = 0.028, η p two = 0.024. We likewise note that didactics years again did not show any significant effect ^three .

In order to further explore the three-way interaction effect, we conducted a 2 (Culture: SG vs. US) × two (Type: Animate vs. Inanimate) mixed ACNOVA on RTs for each age grouping. Amid older participants, as shown in Figure ​ 1A , the ANOVA found a main outcome of Culture–older Singaporeans were slower than older Americans, F(i, 100) = fourteen.32, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.13. More chiefly, the Civilization × Type interaction was meaning, F(1, 100) = 9.eleven, p = 0.003, η p 2 = 0.084. It occurred because the divergence between Singaporeans and Americans were significantly larger for inanimate organisms (RTs: 1400.73 vs. 1195.73 ms, t(101) = four.37, p < 0.001, d = 0.86) than for breathing organisms (RTs: 1138.91 vs. 1011.01 ms, t(101) = 3.65, p < 0.001, d = 0.73). In other words, the predicted cultural differences in the typicality effect were confirmed. In contrast, amid younger participants, a two (Culture) × 2 (Blazon) ANCOVA but establish a main effect of Type (RTs: inanimate > animate organisms) F(1,97) = 7.sixty, p = 0.007, η p 2 = 0.073. That is, for both young Singaporeans and Americans showed the typicality consequence to a like caste, RTs (ms): 1027.95 vs. 919.93, t(48) = 6.nineteen, p < 0.001 for Singaporeans and 1071.27 vs. 952.79, t(50) = five.64, p < 0.001 ^four .

Mean RTs in the category judgment task by civilization: (A) old and (B) young participants.

Another manner to look at the three-way interaction is conducting a 2 (Age) × two (Blazon) ANCOVA within each civilization. These ANCOVAs revealed a meaning Age × Type interaction effect for both Singaporeans, F(1,95) = 22.41, p < 0.001, η p two = 0.xix, and Americans, F(1,103) = iii.75, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.04. This suggests that the typicality effect was larger for older participants than for younger participants in both cultures. However, equally indicated in the significant three-way interaction effect of the overall ANCOVA, the historic period-related divergence in the typicality effect was more pronounced among Singaporeans than among Americans.

Taken together, a series of ANCOVA analyses on RTs showed the predicted blueprint of the Age × Culture interaction. Consistent with our prediction, cultural differences were negligible among younger participants but were revealed in older participants. We argued that this occurred because (1) our task was a performance measure out, favoring Americans and nevertheless, (2) it was a simple semantic judgment and hence, its cognitive loads were low, especially for younger participants (for instance, the overall accurateness ranged from 0.96 to 0.99 among the four groups). We believe that this allowed immature Singaporeans to overcome cultural disadvantages.

Cerebral Role and Cultural Values

In gild to investigate a possible mechanism underlying the cultural differences in the previous section, we conducted a moderated mediation assay using the Process macro (Hayes, 2013). First, we reasoned that the typicality consequence was stronger for Singaporeans than for Americans because Singaporean endorsed Due east Asian culture and hence, intuitive reasoning. In other words, cultural differences in the typicality effect would exist mediated past participants' endorsement of East Asian culture, as measured by cultural values. Notwithstanding, this mediation upshot would be chastened by cognitive part as those with enough cognitive resources (e.g., young Singaporeans) should overcome the disadvantage of cultural reasoning (i.e., intuitive reasoning). This implies a moderated mediation model depicted in Figure ​ 2 (Model 14). To test this model, the cost of atypicality (the relative cost of inanimate organisms in RTs) was calculated by subtracting RTs for animate organisms from RTs for inanimate organisms. So, this atypicality cost was used as a dependent variable in the chastened mediation model. In the model, culture was used every bit the independent variable (Singaporeans = -1; Americans = ane), cultural values (i.east., conservation) equally the mediator, and cognitive function as the moderator of the cultural value (i.e., mediator) to the atypicality cost (i.e., DV). Education years were also included as a covariate. Since information technology is critical to our prediction to compare participants with expert cognitive role and those with poor cognitive function, we estimated the conditional indirect upshot at 1 standard divergence higher up and below the mean of cognitive part.

Moderated arbitration. I'southward endorsement of culture interacts with cerebral role to predict his or her operation in the category judgment task.

The analyses reported in Tables ​ 2 , ​ iii supported our hypothesis. First, as shown in Table ​ 2 , culture significantly predicted one'due south endorsement of conservation (the mediator model) and also, one's endorsement of conservation interacted with cognitive function to predict the typicality cost (the DV model). More importantly, the conditional indirect effects in Tabular array ​ iii showed that the indirect effect of culture on the atypicality price through one'south endorsement of conservation was pregnant for those with poor cognitive role (i.e., -1 SD), as indicated in the CI that did not include zero. In contrast, the CI for the indirect event included zip and hence, was not significant for those with skilful cognitive part (i.e., +1 SD). As inferred in this patter, the 95% confidence interval of the alphabetize of chastened mediation (Hayes, 2015) did not include zero suggesting significant moderated mediation, Index = -9.59, SE = v.37, 95% CI [-22.03, -0.34]. In other words, Singaporeans with poor cognitive function suffered more than from the typicality effects than Americans considering of their endorsement of East Asian civilization whereas Singaporeans with good cognitive office could overcome disadvantage of E Asian cultural reasoning. This is consistent with our interpretation of the age × civilization interaction on the typicality (i.eastward., just older participants showed cultural differences because of their relatively poor cognitive function).

Tabular array two

Regression coefficients in the moderated mediation model.

Model	B	SE	β	t	p
Mediator model		(Mediator = Conservation)
Constant	0.29	0.twoscore		0.72	0.472
Culture	0.46	0.06	0.46	vii.33	0.000
Education years	-0.019	0.03		-0.69	0.492
DV model		(DV = Atypicality cost)
Constant	102.44	69.48		one.47	0.142
Civilisation	7.01	12.92		0.54	0.588
Conservation	25.89	thirteen.91		1.86	0.064
Cdognitive function	-43.75	12.43		-3.52	0.001
Conservation × Cerebral function	-21.58	10.86		-1.99	0.048
Pedagogy years	3.95	4.76		0.82	0.408

Table 3

Conditional indirect effect at one standard difference below and above the hateful of cognitive office.

Cerebral function	Effect	SE	95% CI
-i SD	21.eleven	8.78	[6.52, 41.45]
+1 SD	one.92	vii.27	[-12.thirty, xvi.79]

Alternative Explanations

Adjacent, we addressed a couple of alternative explanations for our findings. Beginning, one may suspect that differences in cognitive role are associated with cultural differences in the typicality furnishings we found among older participants. Nonetheless, among older participants, cognitive office did not vary across cultures, β = -11, p > 0.20 and too, cultural differences remained pregnant even when decision-making for cognitive function, β = 0.21, p = 0.04. Instead, our data suggest that the cultural difference in category judgment amidst older adults was mediated by cultural values. Specifically, civilization significantly predicted cultural values (conservation), β = 0.51, p < 0.001 (SG → more than endorsement of Due east Asian values), and cultural values, in turn, predicted the atypicality cost, even after controlling for culture, β = 0.21, p = 0.07. Furthermore, when decision-making for cultural values, the culture event on the cost decreased from β = 0.22, p = 0.02 to β = 0.12, ns. Moreover, the Sobel test showed that the mediating event of cultural values was marginally significant, Z = 1.77, p = 0.08 (Figure ​ 3A ).

Mediation analyses: (A) the mediating effect of cultural values on the cultural difference and (B) the mediating effect of cerebral part on the age departure, ^∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ^∗ p ≤ 0.05 and ⁺ p = 0.07.

Second, some may fence that age differences in the typicality effect are closely linked to conservation (i.east., East Asian values) equally opposed to cognitive function because conservation would be more endorsed by older participants than by younger participants in general. Since in that location was no Age × Culture interaction on cognitive function, we collapsed the data beyond cultures and tested this idea. Opposite to the argument that the age differences in the typicality effect might be driven by conservation, the age consequence on the atypicality cost remained meaning fifty-fifty afterward controlling for conservation, β = 0.25, p = 0.001, although conservation was associated with the atypicality price, β = 0.28, p < 0.001. Instead, cognitive function significantly predicted the atypicality cost in RT after controlling for age, β = -0.21, p = 0.045 (less cerebral ability → more than cost). Moreover, equally predicted, at that place was no upshot of age on the atypicality cost after decision-making for cognitive function, β = 0.16, ns. Finally, the Sobel test showed that the mediating effect of cognitive function was pregnant, Z = i.95, p = 0.05 (Figure ​ 3B ). Thus, every bit predicted, the age difference in category judgment was mediated past cognitive function.

Taken together, a series of mediation analyses shows that aging and culture both play an important role in cognition and yet, different processes underlie the effects (cognitive function for the age event and cultural values for the civilization effect). More importantly, as the moderated mediation analysis suggests, cognitive function and cultural values interacted in the predicted way, such that a participant's endorsement of culture mattered only for those with poor cognitive function when dealing with a relatively easy task. Nevertheless, we note that cross-sectional arbitration analyses should exist interpreted with greater caution than longitudinal data (Spencer et al., 2005; Bullock et al., 2010), especially with respect to aging (Lindenberger et al., 2011). Despite this limitation, the present data suggested that age and civilisation tin can collaborate with each other to jointly influence one's reasoning.

Give-and-take

To our knowledge, the present inquiry is a rare examination of the historic period × civilisation interaction in cognition, demonstrating that a reasoning task is jointly affected both by cultural knowledge and cerebral resources. We found that older adults performed worse than did younger adults on an singular judgment job that require inhibiting an intuitive categorization judgment. Although both young Singaporeans and young Americans performed similarly on this task, we observed civilisation effects in older adults. Older, simply not younger, Singaporeans showed the typicality result more than did their counterparts in the Usa. Moreover, we likewise showed that cultural values and cognitive function interacted with each other to influence cognition such that cultural values fabricated a deviation for those without sufficient cognitive resources, but not for those with sufficient cognitive resources to deal with relative cultural disadvantages.

The get-go implication of the current findings is that cultural biases not nowadays in young adults may be revealed with age. The chore used in the present enquiry was quite easy (mean RT for even the old Singaporeans was less than 1.5 s and their accuracy was over 97%). We argue that younger people are able to overcome mild disadvantages that a culturally incompatible job imposed, as long as cerebral loads for the job are low. In line with this reasoning, present work constitute that the cultural departure in the task was negligible among younger participants, whereas it became evident amongst older participants. Equally such, present work suggests that diverse factors (e.g., age, cerebral function, cultural knowledge, and task difficulty) should be taken into account to fully empathize the interplay between age and culture. Systematic investigation of these issues would be a worthy endeavor for future work.

Another implication of the current work is suggesting that unlike processes may exist responsible for aging and for cultural effects on knowledge. A series of regression analyses showed that aging effects are closely linked to historic period related declines in cognitive function whereas cultural influences are highly associated with one's endorsement of their culture. Firstly, across the two cultures, the age differences in the atypicality cost disappeared when controlling for cognitive function, suggesting that age-related declines in cognitive function may mediate the corresponding historic period-differences in the atypicality cost. Second, our information also showed that cultural differences between older Singaporean and American participants disappeared when controlling for cultural values, suggesting that cultural values may mediate cultural differences in the singular toll. More importantly, we provided empirical evidence showing that cultural values and cognitive function jointly influence our cognition. Specifically, the moderated mediation showed that East Asian values (i.e., conservation) mediated a cost of East Asian reasoning (i.e., atypicality cost) only when one did not have enough cognitive resources to overcome cultural disadvantages. Then, this finding shows how cognitive function and civilization interact with each other to decide our cerebral processes.

Earlier endmost, several cautionary notes seem warranted. First, at that place was an age × culture interaction event on teaching years that closely resembled the key interaction effect we plant in the atypicality effect. Namely, old American participants were more educated than quondam Singaporean participants. This may be problematic as teaching is closely associated with cognitive functioning. All the same, our old Singaporeans received more education, compared to old Singaporeans in other similar studies (due east.g., Chee et al., 2009). Also, in spite of less education, old Singaporeans did non significantly differ from old Americans in terms of basic cerebral functions such as processing speed or working memory. Moreover, the fundamental interaction betwixt age and culture remained significant after controlling for teaching years. Similarly, it may exist problematic to apply English language materials for Singaporeans although both young and old participants in the present research were fluent in English. Thus, these problems regarding didactics years and native language should exist further addressed in future work. 2d, although atypical trials found the critical condition of the present work, its number may be not enough to test the fundamental interaction. However, variations among atypical trials were comparable to those amid typical trials that had enough number of trials, as indicated in the error bars of Effigy ​ 1 . This suggests that the small number of singular trials might not be a serious issue in the nowadays enquiry. Third, the nowadays work focused on age-related cognitive decline and nevertheless, wise reasoning has been testify to improve into old age presumably because of life experiences (Grossmann et al., 2010). Thus, information technology would be a worthy try for future research to investigate how civilisation may collaborate with historic period-related improvement in reasoning, as shown in a contempo study (Grossmann et al., 2012). Finally, the present research is cross-exclusive and thus, it is difficult to rule out other potential generations effects. Thus, this issue should be clarified in future piece of work with a longitudinal pattern.

To conclude, the results clearly demonstrated the articulation issue of biological processing (crumbling) and sustained experiences (culture) on cognition. As Park and Gutchess (2002) proposed, the Age × Civilisation interaction can provide a unique opportunity to examine how biological and experiential factors may come up together to act on our reasoning, since aging influences in cognition rely by and large on biological factors and cultural influences rely largely on experiential factors. Therefore, the historic period × civilization interaction is an important domain for systematic investigation and an effort to sympathize the bear upon of neurobiology and situated context on cognition. We hope that the present work adds to the emerging literature on such investigations (Kitayama et al., 2013, unpublished).

Ethics Argument

This study was carried out in accord with the recommendations of the Institutional Review Board at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with written informed consent from all subjects. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the same IRB.

Writer Contributions

All authors adult the study concept and contributed to the study pattern. JN performed the data analysis and all authors discussed the results. JN drafted the manuscript and the other authors provided comments and revised the manuscript.

Disharmonize of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the inquiry was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

APPENDIX

Words used in the category judgment task.

Animate living objects: baby, banker, carry, beaver, blacksmith, camel, clown, melt, crow, doe, dove, duchess, geese, equus caballus, lawyer, miner, mosquito, moth, mule, nun, pup, queen, robber, toad, uncle, walrus

Inanimate living objects: flower, elm, dandelion, plant, seaweed, shrug

Funding. This piece of work was supported by the National Institute on Aging (R01 AG015047-09) awarded to DP.

¹Information technology may be argued that using English is problematic considering of potential differences in English fluency between young and old Singaporeans. However, English is the official language in Singapore and thus, both young and old Singaporeans were fluent in English. For example, old Singaporeans performed also as erstwhile Americans in our cerebral function tasks although they were tested with English. Further, we predicted that former Singaporeans would be slower for the singular trials than for the typical trials and however, there is no reason to believe that English fluency would be particularly problematic for the atypical trials. All in all, English fluency is non an event in interpreting the results in the present research.

²Mean RTs were used just median RTs also produced the aforementioned pattern of results. Also note that mean RTs were calculated for correct responses and outliers within each participant (mean ± 2.five SD) were excluded.

^threeIn improver to the three-fashion interaction effect, other effects (primary effects of historic period and civilization as well as age × blazon, age × culture interaction effects) were significant, all Fs > iv.70, all psouth < 0.05. The nature of these effects were revealed and discussed in the following analyses.

⁴It may seem odd that nosotros did non discover whatever cultural difference amid younger participants. In fact, this may be inconsistent with the previous study (due east.k., Norenzayan et al., 2002) reporting cultural difference in categorization. However, even in the previous study, cultural departure was constitute when the task was framed as a similarity judgment, simply not when the task was framed as a classification judgment (e.thou., Study two in Norenzayan et al., 2002; meet also Gutchess et al., 2006). Thus, when a categorization task is introduced equally a formal exam with right answers (as in our study), it is non uncommon to fail to find cultural difference amongst younger adults who are taught formal logic (e.g., college students).

References

• Blanchard-Fields F., Chen Y., Horhota Chiliad., Wang Chiliad. (2007). Cultural differences in the human relationship between aging and the correspondence bias. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 62 362–365. 10.1093/geronb/62.6.P362 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bullock J. G., Dark-green D. P., Ha Southward. E. (2010). Aye, simply what'south the mechanism? (don't expect an easy answer). J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 98 550–558. 10.1037/a0018933 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Cattell R. B. (1949). Test of "one thousand": Culture Fair. Savoy, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing. [Google Scholar]
• Chee M. W. Fifty., Chen K. H. Thousand., Zheng H., Chan G. P. L., Isaac Five., Sim Due south. K. Y., et al. (2009). Cognitive role and brain structure correlations in healthy elderly East Asians. Neuroimage 46 257–269. ten.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.036 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Chee M. Westward. L., Zheng H., Goh J. O. S., Park D., Sutton B. P. (2010). Brain structure in young and sometime East Asians and Westerners: comparisons of structural book and cortical thickness. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23 1065–1079. 10.1162/jocn.2010.21513 [PMC gratis commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Cheung H., Kemper S. (1993). Retrieve and joint of English and Chinese words by Chinese-English bilinguals. Mem. Cogn. 21 666–670. 10.3758/bf03197197 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Choi I., Nisbett R. Eastward., Norenzayan A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: variation and universality. Psychol. Balderdash. 125 47–63. 10.1037/0033-2909.125.one.47 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Chua H. F., Chen Due west., Park D. C. (2006). Source memory. Crumbling Cult. Gerontol. 52 306–313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Folstein Grand. F., Folstein S. E., McHugh P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: a applied method for grading the cognitive country of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 12 189–198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Grossmann I., Karasawa M., Izumi Due south., Na J., Varnum Thou. E. West., Kitayama South., et al. (2012). Crumbling and wisdom: culture matters. Psychol. Sci. 23 1059–1066. x.1177/0956797612446025 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Grossmann I., Na J., Varnum 1000. Eastward. W., Park D. C., Kitayama S., Nisbett R. E. (2010). Reasoning about social conflicts improves into old age. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. UsaA. 107 7246–7250. 10.1073/pnas.1001715107 [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Gutchess A. H., Yoon C., Luo T., Feinberg F., Hedden T., Jing Q., et al. (2006). Categorical organization in free recall across culture and historic period. Gerontology 52 314–323. 10.1159/000094613 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Hasher L., Zacks R. T. (1988). "Working retentivity, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view," in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation Vol. 22 ed. Bower Chiliad. H. (New York, NY: Bookish Press; ), 193–225. [Google Scholar]
• Hayes A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Procedure Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
• Hayes A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear chastened arbitration. Multivar. Behav. Res. 50 one–22. 10.1080/00273171.2014.962683 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Hedden T., Park D. C., Nisbett R., Ji Fifty.-J., Jing Q., Jiao S. (2002). Cultural variation in verbal versus spatial neuropsychological function across the life span. Neuropsychology 16 65–73. 10.1037/0894-4105.xvi.ane.65 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• James Due west. (1890/1950). Principles of Psychology. New York, NY: Holt. [Google Scholar]
• Knowles E. D., Morris M. Westward., Chiu C.-Y., Hong Y.-Y. (2001). Culture and the procedure of person perception: show for automaticity among East Asians in correcting for situational influences on beliefs. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27 1344–1356. 10.1177/01461672012710010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Lindenberger U., von Oertzen T., Ghisletta P., Hertzog C. (2011). Cross-exclusive age variance extraction: what's alter got to do with information technology? Psychol. Aging 26 34–47. ten.1037/a0020525 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Nisbett R. Due east., Peng M., Choi I., Norenzayan A. (2001). Civilisation and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic noesis. Psychol. Rev. 108 291–310. 10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Norenzayan A., Smith East. Eastward., Kim B. J., Nisbett R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cogn. Sci. 26 653–684. 10.1207/s15516709cog2605_4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Park D. C., Gutchess A. H. (2002). Crumbling, knowledge, and civilization: a neuroscientific perspective. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26 859–867. ten.1016/s0149-7634(02)00072-6 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Park D. C., Nisbett R., Hedden T. (1999). Aging, culture, and cognition. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 54 75–84. 10.1093/geronb/54B.ii.P75 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Park D. C., Smith A. D., Lautenschlager G., Earles J. L., Frieske D., Zwahr One thousand., et al. (1996). Mediators of long-term retentivity operation across the life span. Psychol. Aging eleven 621–637. 10.1037/0882-7974.11.4.621 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Schwartz S. H. (1992). "Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries," in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 25 ed. Zanna Thou. P. (San Diego, CA: Academic Press; ), i–65. [Google Scholar]
• Schwartz South. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the construction and contents of human values? J. Soc. Issues 50 19–45. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Schwartz Due south. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 48 23–47. x.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00047.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Sloman South. A. (1993). Feature-based induction. Cogn. Psychol. 25 231–280. x.1006/cogp.1993.1006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Spencer S. J., Zanna G. P., Fong K. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89 845–851. ten.1037/0022-3514.89.half-dozen.845 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Spieler D. H., Balota D. A., Faust M. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22 461–479. 10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.461 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Yang Fifty., Chen W., Ng A. H., Fu X. (2013). Aging, culture, and retentiveness for categorically processed information. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 68 872–881. 10.1093/geronb/gbt006 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

---

Articles from Frontiers in Psychology are provided hither courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

---

bruntnellsomuckledge.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5366355/

Share :